CFTC v. Charles, The Borrowing Station (ponzi schemes, 2013)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In August 2013 the CFTC announced a Maryland federal consent order requiring Sidney J. Charles, Jr. and The Borrowing Station, LLC to pay $254,236 in restitution and a $350,000 civil penalty over a forex Ponzi scheme.
The record
| Agency | CFTC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 6676-13 |
| Date filed | 2013-08-26 |
| Date resolved | 2013-08-26 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, District of Maryland |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | trading ban |
| Defendants | Sidney J. Charles, Jr. ; The Borrowing Station, LLC |
| Techniques | Ponzi schemes |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $350k
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $350k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The order, entered August 23, 2013 by Judge Grimm, finds that from October 2009 to July 2011 the defendants solicited $369,326 from 18 participants with promises of 25 percent a year or 10 percent a month and false guarantees against loss, put only part of it into trading, and lost most of that. It bans both from trading and registration. The headline figure of over $600,000 adds restitution to the penalty.
This library tags the matter as ponzi schemes because the document describes payments to earlier participants made from later participants' money. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Ponzi schemes — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2013-08-26 CFTC release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Ponzi Schemes | — | settled |
| SEC v. Leor Moshe, Jacob Goldman, Isaac Odes (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-13 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| CFTC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher A. Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V. and others (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-24 | Ponzi Schemes | $449k | judgment |
| CFTC v. Trevor L. Vernon and Argent Capital Management LLC (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-07-07 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |