Market Manipulation. Search

AMF France v. Jefferies International Ltd (spoofing, 2020)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 5, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, in a single reading of the French decision; an independent second reading of 60 of the AMF records agreed on every field for 54 and on the core fields for 59. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (amf-fr-tra-2020-10-29-jefferies-international-spoofing-2020) by email

In October 2020 the AMF agreed a settlement with Jefferies International over 192 sequences in 2015 in which its traders allegedly used large orders cancelled within seconds to move the Euro-OAT futures book; it agreed to pay EUR 300,000.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency AMF (France)
Date filed 2020-10-29
Date resolved 2020-10-29
Court Commission des sanctions (AMF, France)
Status settled
Asset class futures, bonds
Instruments Euro-OAT (French government bond) futures (FOAT)
Venue Eurex
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Jefferies International Ltd (entity)
Techniques Spoofing

What was ordered

Civil penalty
—
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
—
Alleged gain
—
Penalty as published
€300k

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars. This regulator states penalties in EUR. The figure is recorded as published and is not converted, so it does not appear in the USD totals or medians used elsewhere on this site.

What is alleged to have happened

The AMF published an administrative settlement (accord de composition administrative) with Jefferies International Ltd, dated 29 October 2020. This is not a contested sanctions hearing. The agreement took effect only once the AMF Collège validated it and the Commission des sanctions homologated it; the document gives the signing date but not the homologation date, so the signing date is used here.

The AMF opened an investigation in February 2017 into the Euro-OAT future (FOAT) from January 2015. Jefferies, the UK subsidiary of a US bank, makes markets in it. The agreement says Eurex had flagged the orders on 20 August 2015.

The AMF described 192 sequences between 26 March and 13 October 2015 in what it called flash spoofing. Traders placed large passive orders of more than 200 contracts (average market order size under 5) close to the best price on one side, which were seldom executed (4.8%); placed smaller orders on the other side that executed far more often (30.9%); then cancelled at least 95% of the large orders. The imbalances lasted 1.9 seconds on average. The AMF said this let Jefferies deal without crossing the spread, with a gain in every sequence; investigators estimated the market impact at about EUR 38,000.

Jefferies said the agreement is neither an admission of guilt nor a sanction, that it ordered the traders to stop in August 2015 and has since tightened its controls. It agreed to pay EUR 300,000 to the Treasury.

What the record does not show: the agreement describes conduct that the person "could" or "would" have committed, so it records allegations and undertakings, not a finding of breach, and it is not styled as a fine. It does not show whether any later challenge occurred.

This library tags the matter as spoofing. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the decision.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2020-10-29 Settlement agreed (homologated by the Commission des sanctions)

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is published by the issuing regulator under its own terms. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Frank M. Cerisano Jr. (spoofing, 2026) SEC 2026-08-10 Spoofing $335k settled
SEC v. Mingran Wang (spoofing, 2026) SEC 2026-06-25 Spoofing — settled
CFTC v. Sidney Lebental (spoofing, 2026) CFTC 2026-05-06 Spoofing $200k judgment
CFTC v. Gregg Smith and Michael Nowak (spoofing, 2026) CFTC 2026-01-16 Spoofing $350k judgment
SEBI v. Manish Mishra and others (YouTube promotion of GG Engineering, 2025) SEBI (India) 2025-12-19 Social Media Ramps , Spoofing — judgment
SEC v. Artur Khachatryan (spoofing, 2025) SEC 2025-12-16 Spoofing $112k settled

Record added October 5, 2026. submit a correction.