Market Manipulation. Search

AMF France v. Pharnext, M. Daniel Cohen and M. David Horn Solomon (false or misleading information, 2025)

Judgment entered

Checked against the primary document on October 5, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, in a single reading of the French decision; an independent second reading of 60 of the AMF records agreed on every field for 54 and on the core fields for 59. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (amf-fr-san-2025-01-market-abuse-2025) by email

In January 2025 the Commission des sanctions fined the biotech company Pharnext EUR 500,000 and its two successive chief executives EUR 200,000 and EUR 100,000 for failing to disclose US regulator feedback on its lead drug candidate and for publishing misleading statements about it between 2019 and 2021.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency AMF (France)
Release number SAN-2025-01
Date filed 2025-01-20
Date resolved 2025-01-20
Court Commission des sanctions (AMF, France)
Status judgment
Asset class equities
Instruments Pharnext shares
Venue Euronext Growth
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Pharnext (entity) ; Daniel Cohen (individual) ; David Horn Solomon (individual)
Techniques Misleading issuer disclosure

What was ordered

Civil penalty
—
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
—
Alleged gain
—
Penalty as published
€800k

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars. This regulator states penalties in EUR. The figure is recorded as published and is not converted, so it does not appear in the USD totals or medians used elsewhere on this site.

What is alleged to have happened

The Commission des sanctions of the AMF decided the matter on 20 January 2025. The respondents are Pharnext, a biotech company listed on Euronext Growth, its co-founder Daniel Cohen, chief executive until April 2020, and David Horn Solomon, chief executive from April 2020 to November 2022.

The notifications alleged two failures to disclose inside information promptly: the US Food and Drug Administration's request for an additional study of the candidate PXT-3003, inside information by 10 April 2019, and the regulator's non-agreement on a special protocol assessment, inside information by 28 October 2020. They also alleged that press releases and shareholder letters published from April 2019 to February 2021 were false or misleading.

The Commission held that the first information was inside information from 10 April to 31 August 2019 and the second from 29 October 2020, and that Pharnext failed to disclose both as soon as possible. It found manipulation by false or misleading information proved for the press release of 24 April 2019, the shareholder letters of 20 June 2019 and 29 October 2020 and the press releases of 1 and 4 February 2021. It attributed the 2019 breaches to Mr Cohen and the later ones to Mr Solomon.

The fines were EUR 500,000 on Pharnext, 200,000 on Mr Cohen and 100,000 on Mr Solomon. Publication was ordered without anonymisation.

The record does not show the price effect of the statements, whether anyone appealed, or any criminal case.

This library tags the matter as misleading issuer disclosure. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the decision.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2025-01-20 Commission des sanctions decision

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is published by the issuing regulator under its own terms. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEBI v. Lloyds Enterprises Limited and others (advances and financial statements, settlement, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-09-29 Misleading Issuer Disclosure — settled
SEBI v. Omaxe Limited and others (minimum public shareholding via company funds, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-09-24 Misleading Issuer Disclosure — judgment
SEBI v. Tarapur Transformers Limited and others (diverted funds and inflated receivables, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-08-31 Misleading Issuer Disclosure — judgment
SEBI v. Trafiksol ITS Technologies Limited and others (misleading IPO prospectus, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-08-28 Misleading Issuer Disclosure — judgment
SEBI v. Debock Industries Limited and others (fictitious issues, inflated sales and diverted rights-issue funds, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-08-28 Misleading Issuer Disclosure , Price Manipulation — judgment
SEBI v. Varanium Cloud Limited and others (false accounts, diverted IPO funds and share sales, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-08-25 Misleading Issuer Disclosure , Price Manipulation — judgment

Record added October 5, 2026. submit a correction.