JPMorgan Chase Bank
Named as a respondent in 5 matters recorded in this library, between 2013 and 2020. Naming a company in a record is not a finding against it; each row below uses the status words of the record it comes from.
Matters
| Year | Regulator | What the matter concerned | Status | Money recorded | Case page(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | CFTC | Price Manipulation | Judgment entered | $100,000,000 | |
| 2014 | FCA | FX Fixing | Settled | £222,166,000 | |
| 2014 | CFTC | Benchmark Submission Rigging, FX Fixing, Price Manipulation | Settled | $1,475,000,000 | |
| 2018 | CFTC | Benchmark Submission Rigging, Price Manipulation | Judgment entered | $65,000,000 | |
| 2020 | CFTC | Price Manipulation, Spoofing | Settled | $608,466,601 |
Outcome mix
Latest recorded status of each of the 5 matters: settled 3; judgment entered 2.
Pattern across the matters
The 5 matters were brought by 2 regulators (CFTC, FCA). The techniques most often recorded were price manipulation (4 of 5), benchmark submission rigging (2 of 5), fx fixing (2 of 5), spoofing (1 of 5). The longest gap between the starts of two matters was 4 years. This is arithmetic on the records and says nothing about the merits of any of them.
Similar names
Other entities with similar names appear on separate pages:
What this page does not show
- Being named in a record is not a finding. A filing alleges; only an order, judgment or conviction finds.
- A settled order may be neither an admission nor a denial of the conduct described.
- The records cover only the sources this library ingests. Other matters may exist that it does not hold.
- Money is per matter and may include co-respondents. It is not a figure paid by this company alone unless the record says so.
- Companies are matched by name only. A same-named entity could be a different company, and related entities (a parent, a subsidiary, a sister company) are kept on their own pages.
See also all firms in this library. To report an error, use the corrections page.