Hridaynath Consultancy Pvt. Ltd.
Named as a respondent in 2 matters recorded in this library, in 2022. Naming a company in a record is not a finding against it; each row below uses the status words of the record it comes from.
Matters
| Year | Regulator | What the matter concerned | Status | Money recorded | Case page(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | SEBI | Matched Orders | Dismissed | — | |
| 2022 | SEBI | Matched Orders | Dismissed | — |
Outcome mix
Latest recorded status of each of the 2 matters: dismissed 2.
Pattern across the matters
The 2 matters were brought by one regulator (SEBI (India)). The techniques most often recorded were matched orders (2 of 2). All of the matters started in the same year, which usually means one episode brought by more than one regulator. This is arithmetic on the records and says nothing about the merits of any of them.
What this page does not show
- Being named in a record is not a finding. A filing alleges; only an order, judgment or conviction finds.
- A settled order may be neither an admission nor a denial of the conduct described.
- The records cover only the sources this library ingests. Other matters may exist that it does not hold.
- Money is per matter and may include co-respondents. It is not a figure paid by this company alone unless the record says so.
- Companies are matched by name only. A same-named entity could be a different company, and related entities (a parent, a subsidiary, a sister company) are kept on their own pages.
See also all firms in this library. To report an error, use the corrections page.