Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Zhichen Zhou and Yannan Liu (insider trading, 2015)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-zhichen-zhou-insider-trading-2015) by email

The SEC's November 2015 insider trading case against Zhichen Zhou and his cousin Yannan Liu over MedAssets and Chindex trading ended in consent final judgments filed on 28 December 2015 in the Southern District of New York. Each is liable for $306,929.59 in disgorgement, jointly with the other, and each owes a $306,929.59 penalty. Neither admitted or denied the allegations.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-23403
Date filed 2015-11-10
Date resolved 2015-12-28
Court U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Status settled
Asset class equities
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Zhichen Zhou (individual) ; Yannan Liu (individual)
Cited as charged or alleged Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques Insider trading

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$614k
Disgorgement
$307k
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
$921k
Alleged gain
$300k

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on November 10, 2015 as release LR-23403. The respondents named are Zhichen Zhou and Yannan Liu (2 individuals, 0 entities). The action was brought in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York.

This library tags the matter as insider trading, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against equities.

The court entered a final judgment as to Zhou on 28 December 2015, and a matching judgment as to Liu, each consented to without admitting or denying the allegations. Each judgment enjoins the defendant from violating Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, makes him liable for disgorgement of $306,929.59 jointly and severally with the other, and imposes his own civil penalty of $306,929.59, so each owes $613,859.18 in total. The stored figures count the disgorgement once and add the two penalties, $613,859.18. The judgments are by consent, so the SEC's allegations of trading on non-public deal information were not tested at trial.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary documents linked above. This page summarises the structured record and does not reproduce them.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2015-11-10 Litigation release published
  2. 2015-12-28 Consent final judgments entered against Zhou and Liu (S.D.N.Y.)

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-09-04 Insider Trading $109k settled
CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) CFTC 2026-08-28 Insider Trading $65k judgment
SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-21 Insider Trading — filed
SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-21 Insider Trading — filed
SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-08-13 Insider Trading — dismissed
SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-11 Insider Trading $18.7k settled

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.