Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Whitebox Advisors LLC (rule 105 offering shorts, 2014)

Settled

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission settled an action with Whitebox Advisors LLC, alleging conduct this library classifies as rule 105 offering shorts. The release records a civil penalty of $365,593, disgorgement of $788,779.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number 34-73113
Date filed 2014-09-16
Date resolved 2014-09-16
Status settled
Asset class equities
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Whitebox Advisors LLC (entity)
Techniques Rule 105 offering shorts

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$366k
Disgorgement
$789k
Prejudgment interest
Total relief
$1.2m
Alleged gain

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on September 16, 2014 as release 34-73113. The respondents named are Whitebox Advisors LLC (0 individuals, 1 entity).

This library tags the matter as rule 105 offering shorts, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against equities.

The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $365,593, disgorgement of $788,779. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2014-09-16 Administrative proceeding instituted (cease-and-desist)

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Sourcerock Group, LLC (rule 105 offering shorts, 2025) SEC 2025-08-04 Rule 105 Offering Shorts $250k settled
SEC v. Snow Lake Capital (HK) Limited (rule 105 offering shorts, 2024) SEC 2024-12-19 Rule 105 Offering Shorts $525k settled
SEC v. FiveT Capital AG (rule 105 offering shorts, 2024) SEC 2024-11-26 Rule 105 Offering Shorts $805k settled
SEC v. Centerline Investment Management Limited (rule 105 offering shorts, 2024) SEC 2024-09-23 Rule 105 Offering Shorts $112k settled
SEC v. Gates Capital Management, Inc. (rule 105 offering shorts, 2024) SEC 2024-09-17 Rule 105 Offering Shorts $57.6k settled
SEC v. Kershner Trading Americas, LLC (rule 105 offering shorts, 2024) SEC 2024-05-20 Rule 105 Offering Shorts $812k settled

Record added September 20, 2026. submit a correction.