SEC v. Wedbush Securities Inc., Jeffrey Bell and Christina Fillhart (market access controls, 2014)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In November 2014, the SEC issued an order against Christina Fillhart, a manager at Wedbush Securities Inc., for her part in the broker-dealer's failure to keep direct and exclusive control of its market access risk controls, imposing US$25,000 disgorgement and a US$25,000 penalty, mostly waived for inability to pay.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 34-73654 |
| Date filed | 2014-11-20 |
| Date resolved | 2014-11-20 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | equities |
| Venue | Nasdaq |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Wedbush Securities Inc. ; Jeffrey Bell ; Christina Fillhart |
| Also named elsewhere | Wedbush Securities Inc. |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.15(c) ; Regulation SHO (Rules 203 and 204) ; Market Access Rule (Rule 15c3-5) |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $25k
- Disgorgement
- $25k
- Prejudgment interest
- $1.5k
- Total relief
- $51.5k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on November 20, 2014 as release 34-73654. The respondents named are Wedbush Securities Inc., Jeffrey Bell and Christina Fillhart (2 individuals, 1 entity).
The cached order, which concerns Fillhart, finds that Wedbush, sponsoring customers onto its trading platforms, let customers and platform providers control risk settings, including the controls meant to prevent wash trades, naked short sales and certain erroneous orders, and did not require those controls to be active. Wash trades and layering appear only as examples of what the controls were meant to prevent; no respondent is charged with executing them. Separate orders against Wedbush and Bell are not part of the cached document.
This library applies no technique tag to the matter. The charge is a failure to maintain market access controls under Rule 15c3-5.
Fillhart: disgorgement of $25,000, prejudgment interest of $1,478.31 and a $25,000 civil money penalty, of which $15,000 was waived on her showing of inability to pay, plus a cease-and-desist order.
Fillhart consented to the order.
Timeline
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.