Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Voyager Pacific Capital Management, LLC, Roger David Hardcastle and others (ponzi schemes, 2026)

Alleged — pending

These are allegations. SEC has filed an action; nothing in it has been proven, and the respondents have not been found liable. Everything described on this page is what the regulator alleges, not what a court has found. See our editorial policy.

Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-voyager-pacific-capital-management-llc-ponzi-schemes-2026) by email

In April 2026 the SEC charged Voyager Pacific Capital Management, LLC, Roger David Hardcastle and 11 others. The complaint alleges that the fund manager and three executives used more than $15 million of new investor money to pay current investors in Ponzi-like fashion between 2020 and 2024, partly to cover undisclosed transfers to entities they controlled; nine entities are relief defendants. Hardcastle and Giarmarco consented to bifurcated settlements; the claims against the others are pending.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-26534
Date filed 2026-04-21
Court U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California
Status filed
Criminal parallel Yes: guilty plea (David Hardcastle), E.D. Cal.
Bars imposed conduct-based injunction
Defendants Voyager Pacific Capital Management, LLC (entity) ; Roger David Hardcastle (individual) ; John Giarmarco (individual) ; Vanessa Lung-Medlock (individual) ; Adagio SPE LLC (entity) ; Andante SPE LLC (entity) ; Brighton Cove LLC (entity) ; Cayucos Dream, LLC (entity) ; GSD Equities, LLC (entity) ; HGM Holdings LLC (entity) ; Kastlemark LLC (entity) ; Martin-Taylor Company LLC (entity) ; Premier Property Management Group, LLC (entity)
Cited as charged or alleged Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.17(a) (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques Ponzi schemes

What was ordered

Civil penalty
—
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
—
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on April 21, 2026 as release LR-26534. The complaint alleges that the fund manager and three executives used more than $15 million of new investor money to pay current investors in Ponzi-like fashion between 2020 and 2024, partly to cover undisclosed transfers to entities they controlled; nine entities are relief defendants. Hardcastle and Giarmarco consented to bifurcated settlements; the claims against the others are pending.

This library tags the matter as a Ponzi scheme because the document describes returns to earlier investors paid from later investors' money, as alleged or found. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

Non-monetary relief recorded: conduct-based injunction.

A parallel criminal proceeding is referenced. Civil and criminal outcomes are recorded separately, because they resolve on different standards of proof.

This matter is at the allegation stage. Nothing in the regulator's filing has been proven, and the respondents are entitled to the presumption that it has not been.

Checked on 2026-10-04: no outcome found on SEC pages. The SEC litigation-release index, which runs through LR-26664, has no later release naming these defendants. The release states that Hardcastle and Giarmarco consented to judgments subject to court approval, with monetary relief left for later motion; no later SEC page showing entry was found, and nothing was found for the other defendants.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2026-04-21 Litigation release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-09-04 Ponzi Schemes — settled
SEC v. Leor Moshe, Jacob Goldman, Isaac Odes (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-08-13 Ponzi Schemes — filed
CFTC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) CFTC 2026-08-11 Ponzi Schemes — filed
SEC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher A. Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-08-11 Ponzi Schemes — filed
SEC v. Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V. and others (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-07-24 Ponzi Schemes $449k judgment
CFTC v. Trevor L. Vernon and Argent Capital Management LLC (ponzi schemes, 2026) CFTC 2026-07-07 Ponzi Schemes — filed

Record added September 10, 2026. If this matter has since resolved, been withdrawn or been dismissed, we want to know: submit a correction.