SEC v. Timbervest, LLC Shapiro and others (2014)
On appeal
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In August 2014 an SEC administrative law judge found that Timbervest, an investment adviser, and four of its principals violated the Advisers Act in prohibited transactions including undisclosed fees on timberland sales, and ordered them jointly to disgorge $1,899,348.49 plus interest. The respondents sought review.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 3-15519 |
| Date filed | 2014-08-20 |
| Date resolved | 2014-08-20 |
| Court | SEC administrative law judge |
| Status | appealed |
| Venue | NYSE |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | officer-and-director bar, registration bar |
| Defendants | Timbervest, LLC Shapiro ; Joel Barth Boden ; Walter William Anthony, III Zell ; Donald David, Jr. Jones ; Gordon, II |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Advisers Act s.206 |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- $1.9m
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $1.9m
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission published the initial decision on August 20, 2014 (administrative proceeding 3-15519).
The decision finds violations of Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Advisers Act, including disposition fees earned on the Tenneco Core and Kentucky Lands transactions, and orders a cease-and-desist and joint and several disgorgement of $1,899,348.49 with interest to be calculated.
The matter does not involve insider trading, so that tag has been removed. A prejudgment interest figure of $131,094 previously shown is the amount the Division requested for one transaction, not an amount ordered.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
Timeline
- 2014-08-20 Initial decision
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.