SEC v. Sunchip Technology, Inc. (undisclosed control blocks, 2014)

Status unknown

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission brought an action against Sunchip Technology, Inc., alleging conduct this library classifies as undisclosed control blocks. The release does not state a monetary figure that we were able to extract.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency	SEC
Release number	3-15903
Date filed	2014-06-16
Date resolved	2014-06-16
Court	SEC administrative law judge
Status	unknown
Criminal parallel	No
Defendants	Sunchip Technology, Inc. (entity)
Techniques	Undisclosed control blocks

What was ordered

Civil penalty: —
Disgorgement: —
Prejudgment interest: —
Total relief: —
Alleged gain: —

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on June 16, 2014 as release 3-15903. The respondents named are Sunchip Technology, Inc. (0 individuals, 1 entity). The action was brought in the SEC administrative law judge.

This library tags the matter as undisclosed control blocks, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Undisclosed control blocks — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.

Timeline

2014-06-16 Initial decision

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action	Agency	Filed	Technique	Penalty	Status
SEC v. Airborne Wireless Network and others (pump and dump, 2025)	SEC	2025-02-07	Pump And Dump , Undisclosed Control Blocks	—	judgment
SEC v. Wells Real Estate Investment, LLC, Janalie C. Joseph a/k/a Janalie C. Bingham, and Jean Joseph, et al. (ponzi schemes, 2024)	SEC	2024-08-20	Ponzi Schemes , Undisclosed Control Blocks	—	unknown
SEC v. Damon R. Durante (undisclosed control blocks, 2023)	SEC	2023-06-30	Undisclosed Control Blocks	—	unknown
SEC v. William Andrew Stack, Esq. (undisclosed control blocks, 2023)	SEC	2023-03-31	Undisclosed Control Blocks , Unregistered Distributions	$333k	judgment
SEC v. John W. Pauciulo, Esq. (undisclosed control blocks, 2022)	SEC	2022-07-07	Undisclosed Control Blocks	$490k	settled
SEC v. Jillian Sidoti (undisclosed control blocks, 2022)	SEC	2022-05-17	Undisclosed Control Blocks	$22k	judgment

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.