SEC v. Steven D. Targum et al. (insider trading, 2024)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In August 2024 the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Steven Targum, a consultant to Frequency Therapeutics, his relative Elliot Targum and Nicholas Rosenberg with trading ahead of the February 13, 2023 announcement of negative clinical trial results, avoiding losses of about $110,000. All three consented to judgments, subject to court approval, totalling $110,449 in disgorgement, $10,840 in interest and $110,449 in penalties; Steven Targum's share is $86,750 in disgorgement and in penalty.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-26070 |
| Date filed | 2024-08-08 |
| Date resolved | 2024-08-08 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | officer-and-director bar |
| Defendants | Steven D. Targum ; Elliot P. Targum ; Nicholas J. Rosenberg |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $110k
- Disgorgement
- $110k
- Prejudgment interest
- $10.8k
- Total relief
- $232k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on August 8, 2024 as release LR-26070, filing in the District of Massachusetts.
The complaint alleges that Steven Targum, bound by a confidentiality agreement, learned of the disappointing trial results by email on February 4, 2023 and traded the next business day, and that the other two defendants traded on his information. The recorded totals add the three respondents' stated amounts.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2024-08-08 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |