Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Shaohua (Michael) Yin, et al. (insider trading, 2017)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-shaohua-michael-yin-et-al-insider-trading-2017) by email

In February 2017 the SEC charged Hong Kong private equity partner Shaohua (Michael) Yin with insider trading in DreamWorks Animation and Lattice Semiconductor shares through five nominee accounts. On August 16, 2024 the court entered a consent final judgment imposing an injunction and a $39.5 million penalty, to be paid from the frozen accounts.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-23747
Date filed 2017-02-10
Date resolved 2024-08-16
Court U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Status settled
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Shaohua (Michael) Yin (individual)
Cited as charged or alleged Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; 18 U.S.C. 371 (conspiracy) ; Exchange Act s.32(a) (15 U.S.C. 78ff) (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques Insider trading

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$39.5m
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
$39.5m
Alleged gain
$29m

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

The SEC announced this matter on February 10, 2017 as release LR-23747 in the Southern District of New York. The release alleges Yin traded ahead of the Comcast takeover of DreamWorks and the Canyon Bridge takeover of Lattice using five accounts held by Chinese nationals, rather than his own.

Outcome. In LR-26093 (August 30, 2024) the SEC reports that on August 16, 2024 it obtained a final judgment against Yin, imposing a $39.5 million civil penalty payable from the funds frozen at the start of the case and permanently enjoining him from violating Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. The judgment document is a consent judgment, so Yin agreed to its entry and waived any appeal; the release still describes the trading as alleged. The release adds that a co-defendant, Benjamin Bin Chow, alleged to be the source of the Lattice information, was enjoined in August 2022 and barred from the securities industry in September 2022, and had been convicted in a criminal case. The release says the SEC's litigation is concluded.

What the source does not show: any criminal charge against Yin himself, or whether the five nominee account holders named as relief defendants resolved separately. The outcome recorded here covers Yin only; the record lists him alone.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2017-02-10 Litigation release published
  2. 2024-08-16 Consent final judgment against Yin: $39.5 million penalty and injunction

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Same matter

The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.

Date filed Agency Record Status
2017-02-10 SEC SEC v. Shaohua (Michael) Yin, et al. (insider trading, 2017)(this record) Settled
2024-08-30 SEC SEC v. Shaohua (Michael) Yin, et al. (insider trading, 2024) Judgment entered

This grouping is the library's, made by matching names, techniques, dates and citations when the site is built. It is not the regulator's or a court's determination that the records are one case, and it errs towards missing a link rather than making a false one.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-09-04 Insider Trading $109k settled
CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) CFTC 2026-08-28 Insider Trading $65k judgment
SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-21 Insider Trading — filed
SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-21 Insider Trading — filed
SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-08-13 Insider Trading — dismissed
SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-11 Insider Trading $18.7k settled

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.