SEC v. Sepehr Sarshar (insider trading, 2020)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In August 2020 the SEC charged Sepehr Sarshar, a founder and former board member of Auspex Pharmaceuticals, with insider trading ahead of Teva's tender offer. On 5 May 2022 the Southern District of New York entered a final consent judgment barring future violations of the tender-offer fraud rule and ordering a US$56,222 penalty.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-24876 |
| Date filed | 2020-08-25 |
| Date resolved | 2022-05-05 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | Yes: charged (Sarshar), Southern District of New York, 2020-08-25 |
| Defendants | Sepehr Sarshar |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.14(e) and Rule 14e-3 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $56.2k
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $56.2k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on August 25, 2020 as release LR-24876. The respondents named are Sepehr Sarshar (1 individual, 0 entities). The action was brought in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York.
This library tags the matter as insider trading, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The release references a parallel criminal proceeding. Where a criminal case exists, the civil and criminal outcomes are recorded separately, because they resolve on different standards of proof.
Outcome. SEC release LR-25387 says that on 5 May 2022 the court entered a final judgment by consent. It permanently enjoins Sarshar from violating Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14e-3 and orders a civil penalty of US$56,222. The release does not mention any disgorgement. The allegations in the complaint, that he passed confidential tender-offer information to friends and family who traded Auspex stock, were resolved by consent rather than by a trial finding.
What the source does not show: the criminal case referred to in the original release is not discussed in the 2022 release, so no criminal outcome or sentence is recorded here.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2020-08-25 Litigation release published
- 2022-05-05 Final consent judgment entered (SEC LR-25387, published 9 May 2022)
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Same matter
The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.
| Date filed | Agency | Record | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-25 | SEC | SEC v. Sepehr Sarshar (insider trading, 2020) | Settled |
| 2022-05-09 | SEC | SEC v. Sepehr Sarshar (insider trading, 2022) | Judgment entered |
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |