Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Sepehr Sarshar (insider trading, 2020)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-sepehr-sarshar-insider-trading-2020) by email

In August 2020 the SEC charged Sepehr Sarshar, a founder and former board member of Auspex Pharmaceuticals, with insider trading ahead of Teva's tender offer. On 5 May 2022 the Southern District of New York entered a final consent judgment barring future violations of the tender-offer fraud rule and ordering a US$56,222 penalty.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-24876
Date filed 2020-08-25
Date resolved 2022-05-05
Court U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Status settled
Criminal parallel Yes: charged (Sarshar), Southern District of New York, 2020-08-25
Defendants Sepehr Sarshar (individual)
Cited as charged or alleged Exchange Act s.14(e) and Rule 14e-3 (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques Insider trading

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$56.2k
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
$56.2k
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on August 25, 2020 as release LR-24876. The respondents named are Sepehr Sarshar (1 individual, 0 entities). The action was brought in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York.

This library tags the matter as insider trading, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The release references a parallel criminal proceeding. Where a criminal case exists, the civil and criminal outcomes are recorded separately, because they resolve on different standards of proof.

Outcome. SEC release LR-25387 says that on 5 May 2022 the court entered a final judgment by consent. It permanently enjoins Sarshar from violating Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14e-3 and orders a civil penalty of US$56,222. The release does not mention any disgorgement. The allegations in the complaint, that he passed confidential tender-offer information to friends and family who traded Auspex stock, were resolved by consent rather than by a trial finding.

What the source does not show: the criminal case referred to in the original release is not discussed in the 2022 release, so no criminal outcome or sentence is recorded here.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2020-08-25 Litigation release published
  2. 2022-05-05 Final consent judgment entered (SEC LR-25387, published 9 May 2022)

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Same matter

The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.

Date filed Agency Record Status
2020-08-25 SEC SEC v. Sepehr Sarshar (insider trading, 2020)(this record) Settled
2022-05-09 SEC SEC v. Sepehr Sarshar (insider trading, 2022) Judgment entered

This grouping is the library's, made by matching names, techniques, dates and citations when the site is built. It is not the regulator's or a court's determination that the records are one case, and it errs towards missing a link rather than making a false one.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-09-04 Insider Trading $109k settled
CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) CFTC 2026-08-28 Insider Trading $65k judgment
SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-21 Insider Trading — filed
SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-21 Insider Trading — filed
SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-08-13 Insider Trading — dismissed
SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-11 Insider Trading $18.7k settled

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.