SEC v. Sean Stewart (insider trading, 2016)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In 2015 the SEC sued investment banker Sean Stewart and his father Robert Stewart over an insider-trading scheme worth about $1.1 million. Robert Stewart's judgment was entered in September 2017, and a consent final judgment against Sean Stewart followed on August 12, 2020.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-23620 |
| Date filed | 2016-08-18 |
| Date resolved | 2020-08-12 |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | Yes: sentenced (Sean Stewart (convicted by jury 17 August 2016; 2017 release says three years, 2020 release says two years)), U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York |
| Sentence | 2 years |
| Bars imposed | officer-and-director bar |
| Defendants | Sean Stewart ; Robert K. Stewart |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.14(e) and Rule 14e-3 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- $154k
- Prejudgment interest
- $11.2k
- Total relief
- $165k
- Alleged gain
- $1.1m
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on August 18, 2016 as release LR-23620. The respondents named are Sean Stewart and Robert K. Stewart (2 individuals, 0 entities).
This library tags the matter as insider trading, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
Non-monetary relief recorded: officer-and-director bar.
The release references a parallel criminal proceeding. Where a criminal case exists, the civil and criminal outcomes are recorded separately, because they resolve on different standards of proof.
SEC releases show both defendants resolved. On September 27, 2017 the Southern District of New York entered a final judgment against Robert K. Stewart ordering disgorgement of $153,675.65 and interest of $11,240.76, to be satisfied by a forfeiture order in his criminal case, with a lifetime officer-and-director bar (release 23948). On August 12, 2020 the court entered a final consent judgment against Sean Stewart enjoining him from further violations; the release (24867) states no monetary amount for him. Sean Stewart was convicted by a jury, had that conviction overturned on appeal and was convicted again at a second trial, and the 2020 release gives his sentence as two years in prison. The money fields carry Robert Stewart's amounts. Sean Stewart consented without admitting or denying the allegations. Checked on 2026-10-04.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2016-08-18 Litigation release published
- 2017-09-27 Final judgment against Robert K. Stewart (SEC LR-23948)
- 2020-08-12 Final consent judgment against Sean Stewart (SEC LR-24867)
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
- SEC litigation release
- SEC litigation release 23948 (Robert Stewart judgment)
- SEC litigation release 24867 (Sean Stewart judgment)
Same matter
The library links these 4 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.
| Date filed | Agency | Record | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-18 | SEC | SEC v. Sean Stewart (insider trading, 2016) | Settled |
| 2017-09-28 | SEC | SEC v. Sean Stewart et al. (insider trading, 2017) | Judgment entered |
| 2019-09-26 | SEC | SEC v. Sean Stewart, et al. (insider trading, 2019) | Settled |
| 2020-08-13 | SEC | SEC v. Sean R. Stewart et al. (insider trading, 2020) | Judgment entered |
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |