SEC v. Ronald A. Warren (undisclosed control blocks, 2015)

Settled

✓ Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-ronald-a-warren-undisclosed-control-blocks-2015) by email

In April 2015 the SEC settled administrative proceedings against Ronald Warren, finding that as the named sole officer of InTake Communications, Inc. and BlueFlash Communications, Inc. he let it file registration papers that hid its undisclosed controlling promoters. He was ordered to pay $12,029.88 in disgorgement and $1,380.87 in interest.

The record

What was ordered

Civil penalty

—

Disgorgement

$12k

Prejudgment interest

$1.4k

Total relief

$13.4k

Alleged gain

—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

The Securities and Exchange Commission instituted and settled this proceeding on April 16, 2015 as Securities Act release 9749, without admission or denial by Warren.

Warren was the named sole officer and director of two Florida shells. InTake registered a $30,000 offering in 2010 and changed control in February 2011, and BlueFlash registered one in 2011 and changed control in August 2013. The order finds that both companies' filings misrepresented who controlled them, that undisclosed promoters actually did, and that their stated business plans were never pursued, making them undisclosed blank-check companies.

This library tags the matter as undisclosed control blocks because the order finds that the shell was controlled by persons its filings never named. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The order requires Warren to cease and desist from the antifraud and reporting provisions and bars him from serving as an officer or director of a public reporting company and from penny-stock offerings. He must pay disgorgement of $12,029.88 and prejudgment interest of $1,380.87 in two instalments. The record had shown only the interest.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

• Undisclosed control blocks — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.

Timeline

1. 2015-04-16 Administrative proceeding instituted (cease-and-desist)

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

• SEC order

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Related actions

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.