Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Robert W. Murray (sham tender offers, 2017)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-robert-w-murray-sham-tender-offers-2017) by email

In November 2017 the SEC reported that Robert W. Murray pleaded guilty to securities fraud after the SEC sued him over a fake EDGAR tender offer for Fitbit that he used to trade call options for about $3,100. A consent final judgment in the SEC case was filed on August 13, 2018.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-23983
Date filed 2017-11-09
Date resolved 2018-08-13
Court U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Status settled
Asset class options
Criminal parallel Yes: guilty plea (Robert W. Murray), U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, 2017-11-07
Defendants Robert W. Murray (individual)
Cited as charged or alleged Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.14(e) and Rule 14e-3 ; Securities Act s.17(a) (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques EDGAR filing fraud , Sham tender offers

What was ordered

Civil penalty
—
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
—
Alleged gain
$3.1k

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

The SEC announced this development on November 9, 2017 as release LR-23983, in SEC v. Murray, filed May 19, 2017. It reports that Murray pleaded guilty on November 7, 2017 to parallel criminal charges. The complaint alleges he bought Fitbit call options minutes before a fake tender offer by a sham company, filed on EDGAR, became public on November 10, 2016, and sold them after the price spiked for a profit of about $3,100. This library tags the matter as EDGAR filing fraud and sham tender offers; the conduct is recorded against options. The criminal case is recorded separately. This record and the March 2018 record for the same case (LR-24075) describe the same SEC action.

Outcome: the final judgment as to Murray filed August 13, 2018 in the Southern District of New York records that he consented to its entry. It permanently enjoins him from violating Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, Section 17(a) and Section 14(e) and Rule 14e-8. The SEC's later release in the related Burns case (LR-24557, August 2019) describes Murray as having settled and been sentenced to prison in the parallel criminal case. The copy of the judgment we opened omits the middle pages, so any disgorgement or penalty is not recorded here, and the signing date is illegible; the filing date is used.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with 2 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2017-11-09 Litigation release published
  2. 2018-08-13 Consent final judgment filed against Murray (S.D.N.Y.)

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Same matter

The library links these 5 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.

Date filed Agency Record Status
2017-05-19 SEC SEC v. Robert W. Murray (price manipulation, 2017) Settled
2017-11-09 SEC SEC v. Robert W. Murray (sham tender offers, 2017)(this record) Settled
2018-03-22 SEC SEC v. Robert W. Murray (sham tender offers, 2018) Settled
2018-07-17 SEC SEC v. Mark E. Burns, Robert W. Murray (price manipulation, 2018) Settled
2019-08-12 SEC SEC v. Mark E. Burns (price manipulation, 2019) Judgment entered

This grouping is the library's, made by matching names, techniques, dates and citations when the site is built. It is not the regulator's or a court's determination that the records are one case, and it errs towards missing a link rather than making a false one.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Lee Simmons (price manipulation, 2022) SEC 2022-08-19 EDGAR Filing Fraud , Price Manipulation +1 $223k judgment
SEC v. PTG Capital Partners, Ltd. (sham tender offers, 2020) SEC 2020-03-11 EDGAR Filing Fraud , Sham Tender Offers $1.5m judgment
SEC v. Mark E. Burns (price manipulation, 2019) SEC 2019-08-12 EDGAR Filing Fraud , Price Manipulation +1 $60k judgment
SEC v. Mark E. Burns, Robert W. Murray (price manipulation, 2018) SEC 2018-07-17 EDGAR Filing Fraud , Price Manipulation +1 — settled
SEC v. Nauman A. Aly (sham tender offers, 2018) SEC 2018-03-28 EDGAR Filing Fraud , Sham Tender Offers — judgment
SEC v. Robert W. Murray (sham tender offers, 2018) SEC 2018-03-22 EDGAR Filing Fraud , Sham Tender Offers — settled

Record added September 20, 2026. submit a correction.