SEC v. Robert L. Ruffalo and others (insider trading, 2025)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In January 2025 the Securities and Exchange Commission settled with Robert, Bobbi and Kathrine Ruffalo and Charlie Harte, who traded PGT Innovations and Masonite securities on information passed from Masonite director Barry Ruffalo through his son William, making illicit profits of $21,722, $11,674, $5,587 and $19,672. Combined, they agreed to $58,655 in disgorgement, $1,276 in interest and $70,885 in penalties.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 34-102248 |
| Date filed | 2025-01-17 |
| Date resolved | 2025-01-17 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | equities |
| Venue | NYSE |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Robert L. Ruffalo ; Bobbi J. Ruffalo ; Kathrine R. Ruffalo ; Charlie L. Harte |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $70.9k
- Disgorgement
- $58.7k
- Prejudgment interest
- $1.3k
- Total relief
- $131k
- Alleged gain
- $58.7k
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission issued this settled order on January 17, 2025 (Release No. 34-102248).
The order finds the four respondents traded before the December 18, 2023 announcement of Masonite's planned acquisition of PGT and the February 9, 2024 announcement of its acquisition by Owens Corning. Robert Ruffalo's penalty is $33,396, Bobbi Ruffalo's $12,230, Kathrine Ruffalo's $5,587 and Harte's $19,672; the others' penalties equal their disgorgement. The recorded totals add the four stated amounts.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |