SEC v. Philip Markin (insider trading, 2024)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In September 2024 the Securities and Exchange Commission announced settled charges against Philip Markin, the fifth person charged in the scheme to trade ahead of Merck's February 2021 tender offer for Pandion Therapeutics, who it said made about $16,362 on a tip from his cousin Seth Markin. Without admitting or denying, he consented to a judgment, subject to court approval, with an injunction and a $32,724 penalty.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-26113 |
| Date filed | 2024-09-19 |
| Date resolved | 2024-09-19 |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Philip Markin |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.14(e) and Rule 14e-3 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $32.7k
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $32.7k
- Alleged gain
- $16.4k
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced this settlement on September 19, 2024 as release LR-26113, in a Southern District of New York case filed September 10, 2024.
The complaint alleges that Seth Markin misappropriated the deal information from his romantic partner, an associate at a law firm advising Merck, and tipped his cousin, who in turn tipped a friend, Jonathan Becker, charged in 2023.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2024-09-19 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |