SEC v. Paulson Investment Company LLC (suspicious activity reporting, 2024)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In November 2024, the SEC settled charges against broker-dealer Paulson Investment Company LLC, ordering a US$75,000 penalty for suspicious activity reports that omitted required details, including one referring to a possible wash sale pattern.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 34-101706 |
| Date filed | 2024-11-22 |
| Date resolved | 2024-11-22 |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Paulson Investment Company LLC |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $75k
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $75k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on November 22, 2024 as release 34-101706. The respondents named are Paulson Investment Company LLC (0 individuals, 1 entity).
The order finds that Paulson's reports lacked information FinCEN requires. In one June 2022 example the narrative mentioned a wash sale exception report suggesting day trading for market manipulation but gave no subject name, securities, dates or amounts. Paulson is not charged with wash trading.
This library applies no technique tag to the matter. The violation is an incomplete suspicious activity reporting failure, not manipulative trading by the respondent.
A $75,000 civil money penalty, a censure, and cease-and-desist relief.
Paulson consented to the order without admitting or denying the findings.
Timeline
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.