SEC v. Patrick Churchville, et al. (ponzi schemes, 2022)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a judgment against Patrick Churchville, et al., alleging conduct this library classifies as ponzi schemes. The release records a civil penalty of $225,000, disgorgement of $29.1 million, prejudgment interest of $4.6 million. A parallel criminal matter produced a custodial sentence of 84 months.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-25417 |
| Date filed | 2022-06-09 |
| Date resolved | 2022-06-09 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, District of Rhode Island |
| Status | judgment |
| Criminal parallel | Yes: sentenced (Patrick Churchville), U.S. District Court, District of Rhode Island, 2017-03-16 |
| Sentence | 7 years |
| Defendants | Patrick Churchville, et al. |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Advisers Act s.206 ; Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.17(a) |
| Techniques | Ponzi schemes |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on June 9, 2022 as release LR-25417. The respondents named are Patrick Churchville, et al. (1 individual, 0 entities). The action was brought in the U.S. District Court, District of Rhode Island.
This library tags the matter as ponzi schemes, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $225,000, disgorgement of $29.1 million, prejudgment interest of $4.6 million. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
A parallel criminal proceeding is referenced, with a custodial sentence of 84 months recorded. Criminal and civil outcomes are tracked separately throughout this site.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
Money note: the dollar amounts in this record's text describe the June 2022 final judgment against Churchville; to avoid counting the same amounts twice, the money fields are left empty here and the figures are held on the record for the same case under release LR-23781 (sec-patrick-churchville-et-al-ponzi-schemes-2017).
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Ponzi schemes — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2022-06-09 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Same matter
The library links these 4 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.
| Date filed | Agency | Record | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-05 | SEC | SEC v. Patrick Churchville and ClearPath Wealth Management (ponzi schemes, 2016) | Judgment entered |
| 2017-03-17 | SEC | SEC v. Patrick Churchville and ClearPath Wealth Management (ponzi schemes, 2017) | Judgment entered |
| 2022-06-09 | SEC | SEC v. Patrick Churchville, et al. (ponzi schemes, 2022) | Judgment entered |
| 2024-04-03 | SEC | SEC v. ClearPath Wealth Management, LLC and Patrick Churchville (ponzi schemes, 2024) | Judgment entered |
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Ponzi Schemes | — | settled |
| SEC v. Leor Moshe, Jacob Goldman, Isaac Odes (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-13 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| CFTC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher A. Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V. and others (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-24 | Ponzi Schemes | $449k | judgment |
| CFTC v. Trevor L. Vernon and Argent Capital Management LLC (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-07-07 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |