SEC v. Mustafa David Sayid and Norman Reynolds (pump and dump, 2020)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In July 2020 the Securities and Exchange Commission announced final judgments in the Southern District of New York against securities lawyers Mustafa Sayid and Norman Reynolds over false opinion letters and shell-company control that fed a pump-and-dump of Nouveau Holdings stock. Sayid owes $25,000 in disgorgement, $6,899 in interest and a $160,000 penalty; Reynolds $700, $193 and $75,000. Both are barred from penny stock offerings and from writing opinion letters.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-24858 |
| Date filed | 2020-07-29 |
| Date resolved | 2020-07-29 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Mustafa David Sayid ; Norman Reynolds ; Kevin Jasper |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.5 |
| Techniques | Pump and dump |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $235k
- Disgorgement
- $25.7k
- Prejudgment interest
- $7.1k
- Total relief
- $268k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on July 29, 2020 as release LR-24858. The respondents named are Mustafa David Sayid, Norman Reynolds and Kevin Jasper (3 individuals, 0 entities). The action was brought in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York.
This library tags the matter as pump and dump, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against equities.
The relief recorded in our data is civil penalties of $235,000 ($160,000 Sayid and $75,000 Reynolds), disgorgement of $25,700 and prejudgment interest of $7,092, summed across both judgments. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Pump and dump — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2020-07-29 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Same matter
The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.
| Date filed | Agency | Record | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-13 | SEC | SEC v. Mustafa David Sayid, Norman Reynolds and Kevin Jasper (pump and dump, 2017) | Judgment entered |
| 2020-07-29 | SEC | SEC v. Mustafa David Sayid and Norman Reynolds (pump and dump, 2020) | Judgment entered |
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Michael J. Forster (pump and dump, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-15 | Pump And Dump | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Hanif Shekh and others (price and volume manipulation in five scrips, Mauria Udyog and others, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-06-30 | Matched Orders , Pump And Dump +1 | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Geoffrey Allen Wall (pump and dump, 2026) | SEC | 2026-04-09 | Pump And Dump | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Mark A. Miller, Saeid Jaberian and Christopher J. Rajkaran (pump and dump, 2026) | SEC | 2026-01-27 | Pump And Dump | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Paresh Nathalal Chauhan (Timbor Home bulk-SMS share scheme, remand order, 2025) | SEBI (India) | 2025-12-31 | Price Manipulation , Pump And Dump | — | judgment |
| Market riggers sentenced in ASX ‘pump and dump’ case (ASIC, 2025) | ASIC | 2025-12-22 | Chat Group Pumps , Pump And Dump | — | judgment |