SEC v. Yasuna Murakami and Avi Chiat (ponzi schemes, 2017)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In May 2017 the SEC charged Massachusetts hedge fund manager Yasuna Murakami, partner Avi Chiat and their two advisory firms with fraud, alleging misappropriation of over $8 million and about $1.3 million in Ponzi-like payments. Murakami and the firms settled in August 2018, and Chiat, the last defendant, settled with a judgment on June 21, 2019. Murakami was separately sentenced to six years in prison.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-23837 |
| Date filed | 2017-05-22 |
| Date resolved | 2019-06-21 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | Yes: sentenced (Yasuna Murakami), U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, 2018-05-03 |
| Sentence | 6 years |
| Defendants | Yasuna Murakami ; Avi Chiat |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Advisers Act s.206 ; Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.17(a) |
| Techniques | Ponzi schemes |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $185k
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $185k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The SEC alleged that Murakami misappropriated more than $8 million of investor money for business and personal expenses and made about $1.3 million in Ponzi-like payments to earlier investors as supposed gains, while Chiat helped raise money using fabricated account statements.
According to the SEC, Murakami pleaded guilty to wire fraud and was sentenced on May 3, 2018 to six years in prison and restitution of $10,520,634. On August 6, 2018 the court entered a settled final judgment against Murakami and his two advisory entities for more than $7.9 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest, deemed satisfied by the criminal restitution order. On June 21, 2019 the court entered a final judgment against Chiat, who settled for $345,158 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest and a $184,767 civil penalty, plus an injunction. The SEC called him the last remaining defendant. Only the penalty is recorded in the money fields because the releases give the disgorgement and interest as combined or approximate figures. Checked on 2026-10-04.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Ponzi schemes — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2017-05-22 Litigation release published
- 2018-05-03 Murakami sentenced to six years in prison in the parallel criminal case
- 2018-08-06 Court enters settled judgment against Murakami and his advisory entities
- 2019-06-21 Court enters final judgment against Chiat, the last defendant
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
- SEC litigation release
- SEC litigation release, Murakami sentence (LR-24135)
- SEC litigation release, Murakami judgment (LR-24226)
- SEC litigation release, Chiat judgment (LR-24510)
Same matter
The library links these 3 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.
| Date filed | Agency | Record | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-22 | SEC | SEC v. Yasuna Murakami and Avi Chiat (ponzi schemes, 2017) | Settled |
| 2018-08-06 | SEC | SEC v. Murakami, et al. (2018) | Judgment entered |
| 2019-06-24 | SEC | SEC v. Avi Chiat (2019) | Judgment entered |
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Ponzi Schemes | — | settled |
| SEC v. Leor Moshe, Jacob Goldman, Isaac Odes (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-13 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| CFTC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher A. Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V. and others (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-24 | Ponzi Schemes | $449k | judgment |
| CFTC v. Trevor L. Vernon and Argent Capital Management LLC (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-07-07 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |