SEC v. MIO Partners, Inc. (2021)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In November 2021 the SEC settled with McKinsey's investment arm MIO Partners, finding it failed from 2015 to 2020 to enforce policies preventing misuse of material nonpublic information held by McKinsey partners on its investments committee. MIO was censured and paid an $18 million penalty.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | IA-5912 |
| Date filed | 2021-11-19 |
| Date resolved | 2021-11-19 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | MIO Partners, Inc. |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Advisers Act s.204A ; Advisers Act s.206 |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $18m
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $18m
- Alleged gain
- $80m
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission instituted and settled the proceeding on November 19, 2021 under the Investment Advisers Act.
The order finds MIO allowed active McKinsey partners who held client information, and who saw MIO's own investment information, to oversee its investment decisions without policies designed for the risk of misuse. It charges the policies failure, not trading on inside information.
MIO agreed to a censure and an $18,000,000 civil penalty. The insider-trading tag was removed as a compliance-policy case.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
Timeline
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.