SEC v. Manuel A. Romero (ponzi schemes, 2022)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In May 2022 the SEC announced a final judgment against Manuel Romero, former CFO of Professional Financial Investors, for his role in a Ponzi scheme that raised hundreds of millions of dollars. He consented to an injunction, an officer and director bar, $91,819 of disgorgement, $6,655 of interest and a $50,000 penalty.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-25389 |
| Date filed | 2022-05-10 |
| Date resolved | 2022-05-10 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California |
| Status | judgment |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | officer-and-director bar |
| Defendants | Manuel A. Romero |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.17(a) |
| Techniques | Ponzi schemes |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $50k
- Disgorgement
- $91.8k
- Prejudgment interest
- $6.7k
- Total relief
- $148k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The SEC announced the judgment of April 25, 2022 on May 10, 2022 (LR-25389) in the Northern District of California; the complaint was filed March 31, 2022. It alleged Romero falsified financial statements, commingled funds across PFI entities and paid existing investors from new investor money between October 2016 and May 2020.
The record omitted the penalty and the bar.
This library tags the matter as ponzi schemes because the document describes it as a scheme paying earlier investors with later investors' money. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Ponzi schemes — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2022-05-10 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Ponzi Schemes | — | settled |
| SEC v. Leor Moshe, Jacob Goldman, Isaac Odes (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-13 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| CFTC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher A. Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V. and others (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-24 | Ponzi Schemes | $449k | judgment |
| CFTC v. Trevor L. Vernon and Argent Capital Management LLC (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-07-07 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |