Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Manuel A. Romero (ponzi schemes, 2022)

Judgment entered

Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-manuel-a-romero-ponzi-schemes-2022) by email

In May 2022 the SEC announced a final judgment against Manuel Romero, former CFO of Professional Financial Investors, for his role in a Ponzi scheme that raised hundreds of millions of dollars. He consented to an injunction, an officer and director bar, $91,819 of disgorgement, $6,655 of interest and a $50,000 penalty.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-25389
Date filed 2022-05-10
Date resolved 2022-05-10
Court U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
Status judgment
Criminal parallel No
Bars imposed officer-and-director bar
Defendants Manuel A. Romero (individual)
Cited as charged or alleged Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.17(a) (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques Ponzi schemes

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$50k
Disgorgement
$91.8k
Prejudgment interest
$6.7k
Total relief
$148k
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

The SEC announced the judgment of April 25, 2022 on May 10, 2022 (LR-25389) in the Northern District of California; the complaint was filed March 31, 2022. It alleged Romero falsified financial statements, commingled funds across PFI entities and paid existing investors from new investor money between October 2016 and May 2020.

The record omitted the penalty and the bar.

This library tags the matter as ponzi schemes because the document describes it as a scheme paying earlier investors with later investors' money. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2022-05-10 Litigation release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-09-04 Ponzi Schemes — settled
SEC v. Leor Moshe, Jacob Goldman, Isaac Odes (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-08-13 Ponzi Schemes — filed
CFTC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) CFTC 2026-08-11 Ponzi Schemes — filed
SEC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher A. Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-08-11 Ponzi Schemes — filed
SEC v. Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V. and others (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-07-24 Ponzi Schemes $449k judgment
CFTC v. Trevor L. Vernon and Argent Capital Management LLC (ponzi schemes, 2026) CFTC 2026-07-07 Ponzi Schemes — filed

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.