Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. (2014)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-lions-gate-entertainment-corp-2014) by email

In March 2014 the SEC settled with Lions Gate Entertainment over failing to disclose material information about a July 2010 set of transactions that put more than 16 million shares with a director friendly to management during a hostile takeover fight. Lions Gate paid a $7.5 million civil penalty.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number 34-71717
Date filed 2014-03-13
Status settled
Asset class equities
Venue NYSE
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. (entity)
Cited as charged or alleged Exchange Act s.13(a) (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$7.5m
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
$7.5m
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

The Securities and Exchange Commission issued the order on March 13, 2014.

The order finds that, while fighting a hostile tender offer by a large shareholder, Lions Gate entered three linked transactions on July 20, 2010 involving convertible notes, a change to its insider trading policy and a lower conversion price, and that its public filings omitted material information about them.

The only link to insider trading is the company's relaxation of its own policy so the director could convert the notes. No insider trading is alleged, so the tag has been removed.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

Timeline

  1. 2014-03-13 Administrative proceeding instituted (cease-and-desist)

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.