SEC v. Lawrence F. Cluff, Jr., Roger E. Shaoul, and James Shaoul (insider trading, 2017)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In September 2017 the SEC amended its Mobileye complaint to add James Shaoul as an alleged original tipper, saying he passed news of Intel's deal to his brother Roger, who tipped Lawrence Cluff, with profits above $925,000. On December 17, 2019 the court entered consent judgments against Roger and James Shaoul, with about $5.07 million in penalties; we did not find the outcome for Cluff.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-23935 |
| Date filed | 2017-09-13 |
| Date resolved | 2019-12-17 |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Lawrence F. Cluff, Jr. ; Roger E. Shaoul ; James Shaoul |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.14(e) and Rule 14e-3 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $5.1m
- Disgorgement
- $925k
- Prejudgment interest
- $3.1k
- Total relief
- $6m
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The amended complaint alleged that James Shaoul, whose clinic treated a Mobileye director and his wife, learned of the pending Intel tender offer and told his brother Roger E. Shaoul, with detailed instructions on which options to buy. Roger allegedly told Lawrence F. Cluff, Jr., and all the suspicious trading took place in two accounts in Cluff's name. The SEC charged the three under Sections 10(b) and 14(e).
Outcome: SEC release LR-24698 (December 23, 2019), reporting on the consolidated case SEC v. Waldman, says the Southern District of New York entered final judgments on consent against James and Roger Shaoul on December 17, 2019. Both are enjoined from antifraud and tender offer violations. Roger Shaoul was ordered to pay disgorgement of $925,436, prejudgment interest of $3,143.95 and a civil penalty of $925,436, and James Shaoul a civil penalty of $4,145,982; the judgment itself says they neither admitted nor denied the allegations. The money fields sum the two men. This outcome covers the Shaoul brothers only. The release does not mention Cluff, and we did not find or check the outcome of the claims against him, so the matter may not be fully resolved.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2017-09-13 Litigation release published
- 2019-12-17 Consent final judgments entered against Roger and James Shaoul (S.D.N.Y.)
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
- SEC litigation release
- SEC litigation release LR-24698 (Shaoul final judgments)
- Final judgment as to Roger and James Shaoul (S.D.N.Y., December 17, 2019)
Same matter
The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.
| Date filed | Agency | Record | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-06 | SEC | SEC v. Lawrence F. Cluff, Jr. and Roger E. Shaoul (insider trading, 2017) | Settled |
| 2017-09-13 | SEC | SEC v. Lawrence F. Cluff, Jr., Roger E. Shaoul, and James Shaoul (insider trading, 2017) | Settled |
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |