SEC v. Jordan Qsar, Grant Witherspoon, Austin Bernard, and Chase Lambert (insider trading, 2024)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In December 2024 the Securities and Exchange Commission announced final judgments against former minor league baseball players Jordan Qsar, Austin Bernard and Grant Witherspoon for trading Del Taco call options ahead of Jack in the Box's December 2021 acquisition announcement, on information Qsar got from a former teammate. Together they were ordered to pay $163,931 in disgorgement, $28,991 in interest and $198,214 in penalties; the release reports no outcome for a fourth defendant, Chase Lambert.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-26186 |
| Date filed | 2024-12-05 |
| Date resolved | 2024-12-05 |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | options |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Jordan Qsar ; Grant Witherspoon ; Austin Bernard ; Chase Lambert |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $198k
- Disgorgement
- $164k
- Prejudgment interest
- $29k
- Total relief
- $391k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced these judgments on December 5, 2024 as release LR-26186, in a Southern District of California case filed March 26, 2024; judgments were obtained on November 18, 2024.
Qsar made about $56,500, Bernard about $64,700 and Witherspoon about $42,800 on the trades, and Qsar tipped the other two. Their individual penalties were $63,194, $86,877 and $48,143. The recorded totals add the three respondents' stated amounts.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2024-12-05 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |