SEC v. John Special and John Kenneth Davidson (insider trading, 2019)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In December 2019 the SEC announced settlements with Oklahoma oil and gas executives John Special and John Davidson over trading in Covidien before Medtronic's takeover, with more than $1.5 million in profit. Combined, they and relief defendant Michael Murphy agreed to $1,561,454 disgorgement, $235,604 interest and $1,561,454 in penalties, subject to court approval.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-24690 |
| Date filed | 2019-12-12 |
| Date resolved | 2019-12-12 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | John Special ; John Kenneth Davidson ; Michael Murphy |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $1.6m
- Disgorgement
- $1.6m
- Prejudgment interest
- $236k
- Total relief
- $3.4m
- Alleged gain
- $1.5m
What is alleged to have happened
The SEC alleged that Davidson learned of the deal from a director neighbour despite a warning not to trade, bought shares, and told Special in confidence; Special bought stock and options, including in Murphy's account, and sold the next morning. Special agreed to disgorge $1,182,472, pay $231,782 interest and a $1,542,242 penalty; Davidson $19,212, $3,822 and $19,212; Murphy, a relief defendant not charged with wrongdoing, $359,770 representing profits from the trading in his account. The stored figures are the sums.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2019-12-12 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |