SEC v. Jason McDiarmid, et al. (pump and dump, 2019)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In February 2019 the Securities and Exchange Commission announced final judgments in the Central District of California against Jason McDiarmid, Kenneth Telford and Stop Sleep Go, Inc. (formerly Interactive Multi-Media Auction Corp.) over a pump-and-dump in which the two promoters made about $3.3 million. The judgments total about $6.49 million in disgorgement, $0.59 million in interest and $3.29 million in penalties, with officer-and-director and penny stock bars.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-24398 |
| Date filed | 2019-02-12 |
| Date resolved | 2019-02-12 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Central District of California |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Jason McDiarmid ; Kenneth George Cedric Telford ; Stop Sleep Go, Inc. |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.17(a) ; Securities Act s.5 |
| Techniques | Pump and dump |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $3.3m
- Disgorgement
- $6.5m
- Prejudgment interest
- $594k
- Total relief
- $10.4m
- Alleged gain
- $3.3m
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on February 12, 2019 as release LR-24398. The respondents named are Jason McDiarmid, Kenneth George Cedric Telford and Stop Sleep Go, Inc. (2 individuals, 1 entity). The action was brought in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California.
This library tags the matter as pump and dump, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against equities.
The relief recorded in our data is civil penalties of $3,289,532 ($1,644,766 each against McDiarmid and Telford), disgorgement of $6,493,503 and prejudgment interest of $593,906, summed across the two individual judgments. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Pump and dump — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2019-02-12 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Same matter
The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.
| Date filed | Agency | Record | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-29 | SEC | SEC v. Jason McDiarmid, et al. (boiler rooms, 2017) | Judgment entered |
| 2019-02-12 | SEC | SEC v. Jason McDiarmid, et al. (pump and dump, 2019) | Judgment entered |
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Michael J. Forster (pump and dump, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-15 | Pump And Dump | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Geoffrey Allen Wall (pump and dump, 2026) | SEC | 2026-04-09 | Pump And Dump | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Mark A. Miller, Saeid Jaberian and Christopher J. Rajkaran (pump and dump, 2026) | SEC | 2026-01-27 | Pump And Dump | — | judgment |
| Market riggers sentenced in ASX ‘pump and dump’ case (ASIC, 2025) | ASIC | 2025-12-22 | Chat Group Pumps , Pump And Dump | — | judgment |
| SEC v. George John Drazenovic (pump and dump, 2025) | SEC | 2025-12-19 | Pump And Dump | $236k | settled |
| SEC v. William A. Justice, Keith A. Rosenbaum, Brian D. Shibley, and Randell R. Torno (pump and dump, 2025) | SEC | 2025-07-10 | Pump And Dump | $70k | judgment |