Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. James T. Booth (ponzi schemes, 2019)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-james-t-booth-ponzi-schemes-2019) by email

The District of Connecticut entered a final consent judgment against former investment adviser James T. Booth on February 19, 2021, permanently enjoining him from further fraud violations. He had pleaded guilty in the parallel criminal case and been sentenced to 42 months in prison.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-24629
Date filed 2019-09-30
Date resolved 2021-02-19
Status settled
Criminal parallel Yes: sentenced (Booth), Southern District of New York, 2020-11-18
Sentence 3y 6m
Bars imposed industry-wide association bar, penny stock bar
Defendants James T. Booth (individual)
Cited as charged or alleged Advisers Act s.206 ; Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.17(a) (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques Ponzi schemes

What was ordered

Civil penalty
—
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
—
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on September 30, 2019 as release LR-24629. The respondents named are James T. Booth (1 individual, 0 entities).

This library tags the matter as ponzi schemes, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The release references a parallel criminal proceeding. Where a criminal case exists, the civil and criminal outcomes are recorded separately, because they resolve on different standards of proof.

Outcome. Litigation release 25033 (February 22, 2021) reports that on February 19, 2021 the court entered a final judgment by consent, permanently enjoining Booth from violating the antifraud provisions of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act and the Advisers Act. The judgment document itself contains no disgorgement or penalty figure; it lists the injunctions and says the complaint's allegations are taken as true for bankruptcy-discharge purposes. The release adds that Booth pleaded guilty to one count of securities fraud, was sentenced on November 18, 2020 to 42 months in prison and was ordered to forfeit $4,969,689, and that the SEC had already barred him from the industry and from penny stock offerings.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2019-09-30 Litigation release published
  2. 2021-02-19 Final judgment by consent entered

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Same matter

The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.

Date filed Agency Record Status
2019-09-30 SEC SEC v. James T. Booth (ponzi schemes, 2019)(this record) Settled
2021-02-22 SEC SEC v. James T. Booth (ponzi schemes, 2021) Judgment entered

This grouping is the library's, made by matching names, techniques, dates and citations when the site is built. It is not the regulator's or a court's determination that the records are one case, and it errs towards missing a link rather than making a false one.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-09-04 Ponzi Schemes — settled
SEC v. Leor Moshe, Jacob Goldman, Isaac Odes (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-08-13 Ponzi Schemes — filed
CFTC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) CFTC 2026-08-11 Ponzi Schemes — filed
SEC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher A. Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-08-11 Ponzi Schemes — filed
SEC v. Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V. and others (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-07-24 Ponzi Schemes $449k judgment
CFTC v. Trevor L. Vernon and Argent Capital Management LLC (ponzi schemes, 2026) CFTC 2026-07-07 Ponzi Schemes — filed

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.