SEC v. James T. Booth (ponzi schemes, 2019)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
The District of Connecticut entered a final consent judgment against former investment adviser James T. Booth on February 19, 2021, permanently enjoining him from further fraud violations. He had pleaded guilty in the parallel criminal case and been sentenced to 42 months in prison.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-24629 |
| Date filed | 2019-09-30 |
| Date resolved | 2021-02-19 |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | Yes: sentenced (Booth), Southern District of New York, 2020-11-18 |
| Sentence | 3y 6m |
| Bars imposed | industry-wide association bar, penny stock bar |
| Defendants | James T. Booth |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Advisers Act s.206 ; Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.17(a) |
| Techniques | Ponzi schemes |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on September 30, 2019 as release LR-24629. The respondents named are James T. Booth (1 individual, 0 entities).
This library tags the matter as ponzi schemes, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The release references a parallel criminal proceeding. Where a criminal case exists, the civil and criminal outcomes are recorded separately, because they resolve on different standards of proof.
Outcome. Litigation release 25033 (February 22, 2021) reports that on February 19, 2021 the court entered a final judgment by consent, permanently enjoining Booth from violating the antifraud provisions of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act and the Advisers Act. The judgment document itself contains no disgorgement or penalty figure; it lists the injunctions and says the complaint's allegations are taken as true for bankruptcy-discharge purposes. The release adds that Booth pleaded guilty to one count of securities fraud, was sentenced on November 18, 2020 to 42 months in prison and was ordered to forfeit $4,969,689, and that the SEC had already barred him from the industry and from penny stock offerings.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Ponzi schemes — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2019-09-30 Litigation release published
- 2021-02-19 Final judgment by consent entered
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
- SEC litigation release
- SEC litigation release 25033 (final judgment)
- Final judgment as to James T. Booth
Same matter
The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.
| Date filed | Agency | Record | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-30 | SEC | SEC v. James T. Booth (ponzi schemes, 2019) | Settled |
| 2021-02-22 | SEC | SEC v. James T. Booth (ponzi schemes, 2021) | Judgment entered |
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Ponzi Schemes | — | settled |
| SEC v. Leor Moshe, Jacob Goldman, Isaac Odes (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-13 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| CFTC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher A. Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V. and others (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-24 | Ponzi Schemes | $449k | judgment |
| CFTC v. Trevor L. Vernon and Argent Capital Management LLC (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-07-07 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |