SEC v. J. Patrick O'Neill and Robert H. Bray (insider trading, 2017)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In October 2017 the SEC announced a final judgment against real estate developer Robert Bray over trading in Wainwright Bank shares on a tip from J. Patrick O'Neill of Eastern Bank. Disgorgement of $299,742 was deemed satisfied by criminal forfeiture. O'Neill had settled the SEC's charges.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-23971 |
| Date filed | 2017-10-25 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts |
| Status | judgment |
| Criminal parallel | Yes: sentenced (Bray (convicted at trial, sentenced to two years); J. Patrick O'Neill pleaded guilty) |
| Defendants | J. Patrick O'Neill ; Robert H. Bray |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- $300k
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $300k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The SEC alleged in 2014 that O'Neill, a senior vice president at Eastern Bank, learned of its planned acquisition of Wainwright and tipped his golfing friend Bray, who bought Wainwright shares and sold for nearly $300,000. O'Neill pleaded guilty and settled the SEC case. A jury found Bray guilty and he was sentenced to two years in prison with a $1 million fine; the First Circuit affirmed.
The October 25, 2017 civil judgment enjoins Bray and orders disgorgement of $299,742, deemed satisfied by the forfeiture order.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2017-10-25 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Same matter
The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.
| Date filed | Agency | Record | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-18 | SEC | SEC v. J. Patrick O'Neill and Robert H. Bray (insider trading, 2016) | Settled |
| 2017-10-25 | SEC | SEC v. J. Patrick O'Neill and Robert H. Bray (insider trading, 2017) | Judgment entered |
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |