Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Hari Prasad Sure, et al., Civ. Act. (insider trading, 2022)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-hari-prasad-sure-et-al-civ-act-insider-trading-2022) by email

In 2022 the SEC alleged that three Twilio software engineers and four relatives and friends traded on advance knowledge of Twilio's first-quarter 2020 results. On January 9, 2025 the court entered final judgments against all seven defendants on consent, with injunctions plus disgorgement and prejudgment interest or civil penalties depending on the defendant. Two defendants had pleaded guilty in parallel criminal cases.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-25350
Date filed 2022-03-29
Date resolved 2025-01-09
Status settled
Criminal parallel Yes: guilty plea (Hari Sure and Dileep Kamujula), U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
Defendants Hari Prasad Sure (individual) ; Lokesh Lagudu (individual) ; Chotu Pulagam (individual) ; Dileep Kamujula (individual) ; Sai Nekkalapudi (individual) ; Abhishek Dharmapurikar (individual) ; Chetan Pulagam (individual)
Cited as charged or alleged Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques Insider trading

What was ordered

Civil penalty
—
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
—
Alleged gain
$1m

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the complaint on March 29, 2022 as litigation release 25350, filed in the Northern District of California.

The complaint alleges Hari Sure, Lokesh Lagudu and Chotu Pulagam concluded in a group chat that the stock would rise, and tipped or used the accounts of Dileep Kamujula, Sai Nekkalapudi, Abhishek Dharmapurikar and Chetan Pulagam despite a company policy forbidding it. Criminal charges were announced against Kamujula.

The release records no outcome. The earlier record named only 'Hari Prasad Sure, et al., Civ. Act.' and left the status unknown.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

Outcome. SEC litigation release 26217 (January 14, 2025) says the Northern District of California entered final judgments on January 9, 2025 against all seven named defendants (Hari Prasad Sure, Lokesh Lagudu, Chotu Prabhu Tej Pulagam, Dileep Kumar Reddy Kamujula, Sai Mounika Nekkalapudi, Abhishek Dharmapurikar and Chetan Prabhu Sree Karteek Pulagam). Each consented to the judgment, which means the allegations were resolved by agreement rather than by a court finding after trial. The release says the judgments carry permanent injunctions, disgorgement with prejudgment interest for five defendants, and civil penalties for five (with some defendants bearing both). It also says Sure and Kamujula had earlier pleaded guilty in parallel criminal cases. We opened the judgment documents for Sure (disgorgement of $100,000 plus interest of $5,531.69), Kamujula ($731,322.72 plus $40,454.42), Lagudu (penalty of $38,775.40), Nekkalapudi ($38,775.40 disgorgement, $2,144.94 interest, $38,775.40 penalty) and Dharmapurikar ($4,364.00, $241.41, $4,364.00 penalty). We did not open the two Pulagam judgments, so no combined money figure is recorded here, and criminal sentences are not covered by these sources. Checked on 2026-10-04.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2022-03-29 Litigation release published
  2. 2025-01-09 Final judgments entered against all seven defendants on consent

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Same matter

The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.

Date filed Agency Record Status
2022-03-29 SEC SEC v. Hari Prasad Sure, et al., Civ. Act. (insider trading, 2022)(this record) Settled
2025-01-14 SEC SEC v. Hari Prasad Sure, et al. (insider trading, 2025) Judgment entered

This grouping is the library's, made by matching names, techniques, dates and citations when the site is built. It is not the regulator's or a court's determination that the records are one case, and it errs towards missing a link rather than making a false one.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-09-04 Insider Trading $109k settled
CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) CFTC 2026-08-28 Insider Trading $65k judgment
SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-21 Insider Trading — filed
SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-21 Insider Trading — filed
SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-08-13 Insider Trading — dismissed
SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-11 Insider Trading $18.7k settled

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.