SEC v. Garrett M. O'Rourke and Michael J. Black (pump and dump, 2020)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In November 2020 the Securities and Exchange Commission announced a final consent judgment in the Eastern District of New York against Garrett M. O'Rourke over a pump-and-dump of microcap stocks sold through high-pressure cold calls, with a penny stock bar and $5,763,719 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest. The case against co-defendant Michael J. Black was ongoing, and both men were separately charged criminally.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-24971 |
| Date filed | 2020-11-30 |
| Date resolved | 2020-11-30 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | Yes: charged (O'Rourke and Black), Eastern District of New York |
| Bars imposed | penny stock bar |
| Defendants | Garrett M. O'Rourke ; Michael J. Black |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.17(a) ; Securities Act s.5 |
| Techniques | Pump and dump |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- $5.8m
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $5.8m
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on November 30, 2020 as release LR-24971. The respondents named are Garrett M. O'Rourke and Michael J. Black (2 individuals, 0 entities). The action was brought in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York.
This library tags the matter as pump and dump, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against equities.
The relief recorded in our data is disgorgement of $5.8 million. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
Non-monetary relief recorded: penny stock bar.
The release references a parallel criminal proceeding. Where a criminal case exists, the civil and criminal outcomes are recorded separately, because they resolve on different standards of proof.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Pump and dump — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2020-11-30 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Same matter
The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.
| Date filed | Agency | Record | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-19 | SEC | SEC v. Garrett M. O'Rourke and Michael J. Black (pump and dump, 2019) | Settled |
| 2020-11-30 | SEC | SEC v. Garrett M. O'Rourke and Michael J. Black (pump and dump, 2020) | Judgment entered |
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Michael J. Forster (pump and dump, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-15 | Pump And Dump | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Hanif Shekh and others (price and volume manipulation in five scrips, Mauria Udyog and others, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-06-30 | Matched Orders , Pump And Dump +1 | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Geoffrey Allen Wall (pump and dump, 2026) | SEC | 2026-04-09 | Pump And Dump | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Mark A. Miller, Saeid Jaberian and Christopher J. Rajkaran (pump and dump, 2026) | SEC | 2026-01-27 | Pump And Dump | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Paresh Nathalal Chauhan (Timbor Home bulk-SMS share scheme, remand order, 2025) | SEBI (India) | 2025-12-31 | Price Manipulation , Pump And Dump | — | judgment |
| Market riggers sentenced in ASX ‘pump and dump’ case (ASIC, 2025) | ASIC | 2025-12-22 | Chat Group Pumps , Pump And Dump | — | judgment |