SEC v. Galena Biopharma, Inc. and Mark J. Ahn (unregistered distributions, 2017)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In 2017 the SEC settled an administrative order against Galena Biopharma, Inc. and CEO Mark J. Ahn over undisclosed paid promotion, including an unregistered issuance of options and shares; Ahn pays $677,250 disgorgement, $67,181 interest and $600,000, and Galena $200,000.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 3-17911 |
| Date filed | 2017-04-10 |
| Date resolved | 2017-04-10 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | equities |
| Venue | Nasdaq |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Galena Biopharma, Inc. and Mark J. Ahn |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.13(a) ; Securities Act s.17(a) ; Securities Act s.17(b) ; Securities Act s.5 |
| Techniques | Unregistered distributions |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $800k
- Disgorgement
- $677k
- Prejudgment interest
- $67.2k
- Total relief
- $1.5m
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
On April 10, 2017 the SEC accepted settlements with Galena Biopharma, Inc. and its then-CEO Mark J. Ahn. The order concerns paid stock promotion in 2012 to 2014; it finds Galena sold securities to the promotion firm Lidingo in an unregistered transaction by including stock options in its compensation. Ahn is ordered to pay $677,250 in disgorgement, $67,181 in interest and a $600,000 penalty, and Galena a $200,000 penalty, $800,000 in penalties in all. The record previously showed only Ahn's $600,000 penalty and merged the names.
This library tags the matter as unregistered distributions, based on the conduct the document describes. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Unregistered distributions — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Zachary Miller (unregistered distributions, 2026) | SEC | 2026-03-05 | Unregistered Distributions | — | settled |
| SEC v. David Hudzik (unregistered distributions, 2025) | SEC | 2025-12-23 | Unregistered Distributions | $70k | judgment |
| SEC v. Ongkaruck Sripetch and others (pump and dump, 2025) | SEC | 2025-06-20 | Pump And Dump , Unregistered Distributions | $204k | judgment |
| SEC v. Peter Scalise III and The3rdBevco Inc. (unregistered distributions, 2025) | SEC | 2025-06-17 | Unregistered Distributions | $236k | settled |
| SEC v. Investview, Inc. (unregistered distributions, 2025) | SEC | 2025-01-17 | Unregistered Distributions | $375k | settled |
| SEC v. Tai Mo Shan Limited (unregistered distributions, 2024) | SEC | 2024-12-20 | Unregistered Distributions | $36.7m | settled |