Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Fengjiu Zhang and Xianli Kong (insider trading, 2017)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-fengjiu-zhang-and-xianli-kong-insider-trading-2017) by email

In September 2017 the SEC settled proceedings against Fengjiu Zhang, then head of CNOOC's Canadian subsidiary, and his friend Xianli Kong over trades in Nexen shares before CNOOC's $15.1 billion takeover announcement. Zhang was ordered to pay $77,260 disgorgement and Kong is jointly liable for part of it; the penalties total $88,752.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number 34-81744
Date filed 2017-09-28
Date resolved 2017-09-28
Status settled
Asset class equities
Venue NYSE
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Fengjiu Zhang (individual) ; Xianli Kong (individual)
Cited as charged or alleged Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques Insider trading

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$88.8k
Disgorgement
$77.3k
Prejudgment interest
$11.3k
Total relief
$177k
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

The Commission found that Zhang, who knew of the CNOOC-Nexen negotiations through his job, asked an acquaintance to buy 9,000 Nexen shares for him (profit $65,769) and tipped Kong, who bought 1,500 shares on the last trading day before the July 23, 2012 announcement (profit $11,493). It found that Zhang breached his duty to his employer.

Zhang must pay disgorgement of $77,260.43, interest of $11,266.25 and a penalty of $77,260.43. Kong must pay disgorgement of $11,491.23 and interest of $1,731.61, jointly and severally with Zhang, and a separate penalty of $11,491.23. The stored figures are the combined amounts.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2017-09-28 Administrative proceeding instituted (cease-and-desist)

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-09-04 Insider Trading $109k settled
CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) CFTC 2026-08-28 Insider Trading $65k judgment
SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-21 Insider Trading — filed
SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-21 Insider Trading — filed
SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-08-13 Insider Trading — dismissed
SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-11 Insider Trading $18.7k settled

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.