Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Edward T. Kelly (insider trading, 2020)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-edward-t-kelly-insider-trading-2020) by email

In September 2020 the SEC charged Aceto's former controller Edward Kelly with selling his shares and options while a consultant who knew of poor results and an impairment charge, and announced a consent settlement with a $170,228 penalty and an officer-and-director bar, subject to court approval.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-24912
Date filed 2020-09-23
Date resolved 2020-09-23
Court U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
Status settled
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Edward T. Kelly (individual)
Cited as charged or alleged Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques Insider trading

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$170k
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
$170k
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the matter on September 23, 2020 as litigation release 24912, filed in the Eastern District of New York.

After retiring in March 2018, Kelly was retained to help close Aceto's books for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 and allegedly learned of weak sales and earnings and a pending impairment. The complaint says he sold all his shares and exercised and sold in-the-money options, gaining or avoiding more than $85,000.

Without admitting or denying the allegations, Kelly consented to an injunction, an officer-and-director bar and the penalty. Court approval was still pending, so the status is settled, not a final judgment.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2020-09-23 Litigation release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-09-04 Insider Trading $109k settled
CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) CFTC 2026-08-28 Insider Trading $65k judgment
SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-21 Insider Trading — filed
SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-21 Insider Trading — filed
SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-08-13 Insider Trading — dismissed
SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-11 Insider Trading $18.7k settled

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.