Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Dennis Ira Ringer (unregistered distributions, 2016)

Settled

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission settled an action with Dennis Ira Ringer, alleging conduct this library classifies as unregistered distributions. The release records a civil penalty of $25,000, disgorgement of $2.2 million, prejudgment interest of $303,558.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number 33-10259
Date filed 2016-11-23
Date resolved 2016-11-23
Status settled
Asset class equities
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Dennis Ira Ringer (individual)
Techniques Unregistered distributions

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$25k
Disgorgement
$2.2m
Prejudgment interest
$304k
Total relief
$2.5m
Alleged gain

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on November 23, 2016 as release 33-10259. The respondents named are Dennis Ira Ringer (1 individual, 0 entities).

This library tags the matter as unregistered distributions, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against equities.

The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $25,000, disgorgement of $2.2 million, prejudgment interest of $303,558. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2016-11-23 Administrative proceeding instituted (cease-and-desist)

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Stephen J. Czarnik (paid stock promotion, 2026) SEC 2026-06-29 Paid Stock Promotion , Unregistered Distributions judgment
SEC v. Zachary Miller (unregistered distributions, 2026) SEC 2026-03-05 Unregistered Distributions settled
SEC v. David Hudzik (unregistered distributions, 2025) SEC 2025-12-23 Unregistered Distributions $70k judgment
SEC v. Ongkaruck Sripetch, et al. (pump and dump, 2025) SEC 2025-06-20 Pump And Dump , Unregistered Distributions dismissed
SEC v. Peter Scalise III and The3rdBevco Inc. (unregistered distributions, 2025) SEC 2025-06-17 Unregistered Distributions $236k judgment
SEC v. Investview, Inc. (unregistered distributions, 2025) SEC 2025-01-17 Unregistered Distributions settled

Record added September 8, 2026. submit a correction.