SEC v. Denise Grevas (insider trading, 2021)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In August 2021 the SEC announced charges against Denise Grevas for buying 30,800 Alder BioPharmaceuticals shares after overhearing her spouse's call about Lundbeck's planned tender offer, gaining $286,960. She agreed to an injunction and a penalty to be set by the court, subject to approval.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-25174 |
| Date filed | 2021-08-18 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | Yes: charged (Denise Grevas), U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, 2021-08-18 |
| Defendants | Denise Grevas |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.14(e) and Rule 14e-3 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the matter on August 18, 2021 as litigation release 25174, filed in the Northern District of Illinois.
The complaint alleges Grevas learned of the tender offer in an August 2019 call with her spouse, a member of Lundbeck's due diligence team, and bought across five accounts until the September 16, 2019 announcement, after which Alder's shares rose 84%.
The settlement is subject to court approval and no amount was fixed, so the status is settled, not filed. The release notes a parallel criminal case.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2021-08-18 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |