SEC v. DeAndre P. Sears et al. (ponzi schemes, 2020)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In December 2020 the SEC charged DeAndre Sears and his firm Picasso Group with selling at least $25 million of EquiAlt securities to over 145 largely elderly retail investors across 25 states as unregistered brokers, for about $3.5 million in commissions. They agreed to injunctions with monetary relief to be set later, and Sears to bars. EquiAlt is described as a Ponzi scheme.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-25002 |
| Date filed | 2020-12-31 |
| Date resolved | 2020-12-31 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | penny stock bar, registration bar |
| Defendants | DeAndre P. Sears ; MASears LLC d/b/a Picasso Group |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.15(a) ; Securities Act s.5 |
| Techniques | Ponzi schemes |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The SEC announced the case on December 31, 2020 (LR-25002) in the Middle District of Florida, covering 2014 to 2020. Charges are limited to registration provisions. Sears consented to associational and penny stock bars in an administrative proceeding.
The record named the defendants as "DeAndre P. Sears et al." and listed only the penny stock bar. The tag is retained pending the lead's decision on unregistered sellers of third-party Ponzi products.
This library tags the matter as ponzi schemes because the document describes it as a scheme paying earlier investors with later investors' money. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Ponzi schemes — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2020-12-31 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Ponzi Schemes | — | settled |
| SEC v. Leor Moshe, Jacob Goldman, Isaac Odes (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-13 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| CFTC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher A. Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V. and others (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-24 | Ponzi Schemes | $449k | judgment |
| CFTC v. Trevor L. Vernon and Argent Capital Management LLC (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-07-07 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |