SEC v. David Roda and Andrew Larkin (insider trading, 2022)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In June 2022 the SEC charged Penn Interactive software engineer David Roda and his friend Andrew Larkin with trading Score Media options and shares before Penn National's $2 billion takeover announcement. Larkin agreed to $5,602 disgorgement, $84 interest and a $5,602 penalty; Roda's amounts are left to the court, subject to approval.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-25422 |
| Date filed | 2022-06-15 |
| Date resolved | 2022-06-15 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | options |
| Criminal parallel | Yes: charged (David Roda), U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 2022-06-15 |
| Defendants | David Roda ; Andrew Larkin |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $5.6k
- Disgorgement
- $5.6k
- Prejudgment interest
- $84
- Total relief
- $11.3k
- Alleged gain
- $561k
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the settled complaint on June 15, 2022 as litigation release 25422, filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
The complaint alleges Roda was told of Penn National's interest in Score Media with a warning not to trade, bought 500 out-of-the-money calls for profits of $560,762, and tipped Larkin, who made $5,602. Criminal charges were announced in a parallel case.
The $5,602 figures on the record are Larkin's, not Roda's. The settlements need court approval, so the status is settled rather than judgment.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2022-06-15 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |