SEC v. David J. Minson (insider trading, 2025)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In August 2025 the Securities and Exchange Commission settled with David Minson, finding that in September 2023 he misappropriated information from a close family member, a senior Blue Apron executive, about Wonder Group's tender offer for Blue Apron, and traded before the September 29 announcement, after which the stock rose over 130 percent. He agreed to a cease-and-desist order, $550,842.13 in disgorgement, $41,606.34 in interest and an equal penalty, payable in instalments.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 34-103764 |
| Date filed | 2025-08-22 |
| Date resolved | 2025-08-22 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | equities |
| Venue | Nasdaq |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | David J. Minson |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.14(e) and Rule 14e-3 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $551k
- Disgorgement
- $551k
- Prejudgment interest
- $41.6k
- Total relief
- $1.1m
- Alleged gain
- $551k
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission issued this settled order on August 22, 2025 (Release No. 34-103764).
The order finds that Minson misappropriated the information on at least two occasions from a relative with whom he shared confidences, and charges Sections 10(b) and 14(e) and Rules 10b-5 and 14e-3(a).
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |