SEC v. David A. Altom and Gabriel V. Graven (insider trading, 2019)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In May 2019 the SEC settled proceedings against Seventy Seven Energy manager David Altom and his friend Gabriel Graven over trading ahead of Patterson-UTI's acquisition. Graven must pay $126,835 disgorgement, $10,956 interest and a $136,460 penalty; Altom an $85,000 penalty.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 34-85956 |
| Date filed | 2019-05-29 |
| Date resolved | 2019-05-29 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | commodities, equities |
| Venue | Nasdaq |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | David A. Altom ; Gabriel V. Graven |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $221k
- Disgorgement
- $127k
- Prejudgment interest
- $11k
- Total relief
- $359k
- Alleged gain
- $127k
What is alleged to have happened
The Commission found that Altom tipped Graven, who bought 6,614 shares and tipped another person who bought 500. The share price rose about 70 percent after the December 12, 2016 announcement; Graven's profit was $126,835.35. The stored penalty is the sum of both respondents' penalties.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |