Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. David A. Altom and Gabriel V. Graven (insider trading, 2019)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-david-a-altom-and-gabriel-v-graven-insider-trading-2019) by email

In May 2019 the SEC settled proceedings against Seventy Seven Energy manager David Altom and his friend Gabriel Graven over trading ahead of Patterson-UTI's acquisition. Graven must pay $126,835 disgorgement, $10,956 interest and a $136,460 penalty; Altom an $85,000 penalty.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number 34-85956
Date filed 2019-05-29
Date resolved 2019-05-29
Status settled
Asset class commodities, equities
Venue Nasdaq
Criminal parallel No
Defendants David A. Altom (individual) ; Gabriel V. Graven (individual)
Cited as charged or alleged Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques Insider trading

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$221k
Disgorgement
$127k
Prejudgment interest
$11k
Total relief
$359k
Alleged gain
$127k

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

The Commission found that Altom tipped Graven, who bought 6,614 shares and tipped another person who bought 500. The share price rose about 70 percent after the December 12, 2016 announcement; Graven's profit was $126,835.35. The stored penalty is the sum of both respondents' penalties.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2019-05-29 Administrative proceeding instituted (cease-and-desist)

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-09-04 Insider Trading $109k settled
CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) CFTC 2026-08-28 Insider Trading $65k judgment
SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-21 Insider Trading — filed
SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-21 Insider Trading — filed
SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-08-13 Insider Trading — dismissed
SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-11 Insider Trading $18.7k settled

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.