SEC v. Damon Hovannisian, et al. (insider trading, 2017)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In August 2017 the SEC charged four relatives and a friend with trading International Rectifier stock ahead of its acquisition by Infineon, on information Damon Hovannisian learned from his wife. All four consented to judgments totalling about $155,756 disgorgement and $308,318 in penalties, subject to court approval.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-23901 |
| Date filed | 2017-08-11 |
| Date resolved | 2017-08-11 |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Damon Hovannisian ; Vernon Hovannisian ; Vincent Hovannisian ; Eddie Arakelian |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $308k
- Disgorgement
- $156k
- Prejudgment interest
- $15.4k
- Total relief
- $479k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The complaint alleged that Damon Hovannisian learned of the deal from his wife, a senior employee, had a friend buy shares for him, and tipped his father Vernon, brother Vincent and family friend Eddie Arakelian, who each traded before the announcement. The four made about $155,000.
The settlements, subject to court approval, require disgorgement of $3,194.49 (Damon), $111,145.23 (Vernon), $5,635.12 (Vincent) and $35,781.20 (Arakelian), which total $155,756.04, plus interest totalling $15,399.47 and penalties of $155,756.04, $111,145.23, $5,635.12 and $35,781.20 respectively. The stored figures are these sums.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2017-08-11 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |