SEC v. Curt L Dewitz (insider trading, 2024)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In December 2024 the Securities and Exchange Commission announced a settled case against Curt Dewitz, a former biopharmaceutical executive, who it said traded securities of two related public companies on non-public information from his former employer ahead of its merger announcement. Without admitting or denying, he consented, subject to court approval, to an injunction, an officer and director bar, $70,382.96 in disgorgement, $14,809.53 in interest and a penalty equal to his gains.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-26200 |
| Date filed | 2024-12-19 |
| Date resolved | 2024-12-19 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Curt L Dewitz |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $70.4k
- Disgorgement
- $70.4k
- Prejudgment interest
- $14.8k
- Total relief
- $156k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on December 19, 2024 as release LR-26200, filing in the Northern District of Florida on December 18, 2024.
The complaint alleges violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. The release does not name the employer or the two companies.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2024-12-19 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |