SEC v. Charlie Jinan Chen (insider trading, 2025)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In February 2025 the Securities and Exchange Commission announced a final judgment, entered January 30, against Charlie Jinan Chen, whom a jury found in February 2020 to have traded Vistaprint options ahead of five earnings announcements on information from a family friend who was an insider or the friend's spouse. The judgment enjoins him and orders an $892,827 civil penalty.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-26247 |
| Date filed | 2025-02-13 |
| Date resolved | 2025-02-13 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts |
| Status | judgment |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Charlie Jinan Chen |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.17(a) |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $893k
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $893k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced this judgment on February 13, 2025 as release LR-26247, in a District of Massachusetts case filed April 5, 2018.
The jury found him liable on all counts under Section 10(b), Rule 10b-5 and Section 17(a) of the Securities Act. The release does not state a disgorgement figure.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2025-02-13 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |