SEC v. Benjamin Taylor and Darina Windsor (insider trading, 2026)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In March 2026 the Securities and Exchange Commission announced final consent judgments, entered February 17, against former London investment bankers Benjamin Taylor and Darina Windsor, charged in a multi-year international scheme in which they allegedly misappropriated information on impending deals from their bank. Both were enjoined; Taylor was ordered to pay $500,000 in disgorgement, and Windsor $50,000 in disgorgement and a $50,000 penalty.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-26509 |
| Date filed | 2026-03-27 |
| Date resolved | 2026-03-27 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York |
| Status | judgment |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Benjamin Taylor ; Darina Windsor |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.14(e) and Rule 14e-3 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $50k
- Disgorgement
- $550k
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $600k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced these judgments on March 27, 2026 as release LR-26509, in a Southern District of New York case filed October 22, 2019 and amended March 27, 2020.
The amended complaint alleges the scheme netted its participants tens of millions of dollars from trading in U.S. companies. The recorded disgorgement adds the two stated amounts; the penalty is Windsor's.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2026-03-27 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |