Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Benjamin L. Bunker, Esq. (pump and dump, 2020)

Status unknown

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission brought an action against Benjamin L. Bunker, Esq., alleging conduct this library classifies as pump and dump, reverse merger schemes and undisclosed control blocks. The release records disgorgement of $1,800.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number 3-19668
Date filed 2020-01-23
Status unknown
Asset class equities
Venue OTC
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Benjamin L. Bunker, Esq. (individual)
Techniques Pump and dump , Reverse merger schemes , Undisclosed control blocks

What was ordered

Civil penalty
Disgorgement
$1.8k
Prejudgment interest
Total relief
$1.8k
Alleged gain

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on January 23, 2020 as release 3-19668. The respondents named are Benjamin L. Bunker, Esq. (1 individual, 0 entities).

This library tags the matter as pump and dump, reverse merger schemes and undisclosed control blocks, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against equities, with OTC identified in the release.

The relief recorded in our data is disgorgement of $1,800. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with 3 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2020-01-23 Administrative proceeding instituted (cease-and-desist)

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Joe Yiu Cheung ( and Dylon De Lu Zhang) (paid stock promotion, 2017) SEC 2017-08-02 Paid Stock Promotion , Pump And Dump +2 settled
SEC v. Airborne Wireless Network and others (pump and dump, 2025) SEC 2025-02-07 Pump And Dump , Undisclosed Control Blocks judgment
SEC v. DiScala et al., (pump and dump, 2024) SEC 2024-09-20 Pump And Dump , Reverse Merger Schemes judgment
SEC v. Domenic Calabrigo et al. (pump and dump, 2022) SEC 2022-04-19 Pump And Dump , Undisclosed Control Blocks filed
SEC v. Ulrik Debo (custodianship shell hijacking, 2020) SEC 2020-01-03 Custodianship Shell Hijacking , Pump And Dump +1 filed
SEC v. John Madsen, Andalusian Resorts and others (fake press releases, 2018) SEC 2018-10-23 Fake Press Releases , Pump And Dump +1 judgment

Record added September 8, 2026. submit a correction.