SEC v. Barry Honig, et al. (pump and dump, 2020)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In March 2020 the Securities and Exchange Commission announced final consent judgments in the Southern District of New York against Michael Brauser, John O'Rourke III, John Stetson and three of their companies, and a partial judgment against HS Contrarian Investments, in the Honig microcap pump-and-dump case. The judgments carry injunctions, penny stock bars, and disgorgement, interest and penalties of $1,175,176 (Brauser), $1,153,326 (O'Rourke) and $1,154,669 (Stetson).
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-24765 |
| Date filed | 2020-03-11 |
| Date resolved | 2020-03-11 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | conduct-based injunction, penny stock bar |
| Defendants | Barry Honig ; Michael Brauser ; John O'Rourke III ; John Stetson ; Grander Holdings, Inc. ; ATG Capital LLC ; Stetson Capital Investments Inc. ; HS Contrarian Investments LLC |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.13(d) and 13(g) ; Exchange Act s.9(a)(1) ; Exchange Act s.9(a)(2) ; Securities Act s.17(a) ; Securities Act s.5 |
| Techniques | Pump and dump |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- $27m
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on March 11, 2020 as release LR-24765. The respondents named are Barry Honig, Michael Brauser, John O'Rourke III, John Stetson, Grander Holdings, Inc., ATG Capital LLC, Stetson Capital Investments Inc. and HS Contrarian Investments LLC (4 individuals, 4 entities). The action was brought in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York.
The release says the defendants repeatedly boosted the prices of three public companies and then dumped their shares. Brauser and Grander were also enjoined under the registration provisions, and O'Rourke and ATG under the anti-manipulation provisions of Exchange Act Section 9(a). Honig had separately reached a bifurcated settlement in July 2019, and monetary remedies against HS Contrarian were left for later. The money paid combines disgorgement, interest and penalties and is not split in this record. This library tags the matter as pump and dump.
The conduct is recorded against equities.
Non-monetary relief recorded: conduct-based injunction, penny stock bar.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Pump and dump — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2020-03-11 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Same matter
The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.
| Date filed | Agency | Record | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-07 | SEC | SEC v. Barry C. Honig, et al. (pump and dump, 2018) | Settled |
| 2020-03-11 | SEC | SEC v. Barry Honig, et al. (pump and dump, 2020) | Judgment entered |
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Michael J. Forster (pump and dump, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-15 | Pump And Dump | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Hanif Shekh and others (price and volume manipulation in five scrips, Mauria Udyog and others, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-06-30 | Matched Orders , Pump And Dump +1 | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Geoffrey Allen Wall (pump and dump, 2026) | SEC | 2026-04-09 | Pump And Dump | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Mark A. Miller, Saeid Jaberian and Christopher J. Rajkaran (pump and dump, 2026) | SEC | 2026-01-27 | Pump And Dump | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Paresh Nathalal Chauhan (Timbor Home bulk-SMS share scheme, remand order, 2025) | SEBI (India) | 2025-12-31 | Price Manipulation , Pump And Dump | — | judgment |
| Market riggers sentenced in ASX ‘pump and dump’ case (ASIC, 2025) | ASIC | 2025-12-22 | Chat Group Pumps , Pump And Dump | — | judgment |