SEC v. Alan M. Stark, Esq. (insider trading, 2017)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In September 2017 the SEC settled proceedings against Florida attorney Alan Stark, who it found bought stock in companies before filing beneficial ownership reports for a hedge fund manager client, earning $7,608. He agreed to pay $7,608 disgorgement, $905 interest and a $7,608 penalty.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 34-81523 |
| Date filed | 2017-09-05 |
| Date resolved | 2017-09-05 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | commodities, equities |
| Venue | NYSE, Nasdaq |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Alan M. Stark, Esq. |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $7.6k
- Disgorgement
- $7.6k
- Prejudgment interest
- $905
- Total relief
- $16.1k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Commission found that Stark, who advised a prominent hedge fund manager on beneficial ownership reporting, learned through those communications that the manager had crossed disclosure thresholds, and between February 2013 and September 2015 bought the companies' stock before filing the reports. Prices rose after each filing and he gained $7,608, in violation of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5.
On his consent the order requires disgorgement of $7,608, prejudgment interest of $905 and a civil penalty of $7,608, a total of $16,121.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2017-09-05 Administrative proceeding instituted (102e)
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |